User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

February - June 2013


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Christian Ferrer!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:30, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in to vote

Hello,

Please log in to vote in Quality Images. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, are you this user? In that case, why don't you login? Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Syntax error

Bonjour. Juste un mot au sujet de ta photo d'hier : Nino Verde a commenté ta nouvelle mouture, en même temps que la mienne... mais il a fait deux erreurs de syntaxe, si bien que ses commentaires n'apparaissent pas dans les rectangles bleus où ils devraient être lisibles. J'ai corrigé l'erreur sous mon image, mais je n'ai pas voulu modifier le texte d'un contributeur particulièrement pointilleux (!) sous l'image d'un autre. En revanche, je l'ai prévenu de ses erreurs de syntaxe et je fais de même en ce qui te concerne, pour que tu puisses éventuellement intervenir. -- Autre point : ça fait un certain temps que je désire entrer en contact avec toi car j'ai constaté que nous avions le même problème : un Pentax K5 dont les résultats sont particulièrement décevants. Je n'ai pas le temps de développer maintenant mais nous pourrons peut-être échanger si ça t'intéresse (je suis retraité et j'ai du loisir !). -- J'ai utilisé le tutoiement comme il est d'usage entre utilisateurs français : si c'est gênant, on changera. -- Bonne soirée. Cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Phare de Sète (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare de Sète (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Grondin 17:25, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Brise-lames à Sète.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brise-lames à Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Much better --Poco a poco 19:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RAW file

Hi Christian! I reviewed your photo on QIC. If you like you can send the RAW to MyWikipediaNickname@gmail.com (with the real nickname Tuxyso) and I can help you with hightlights and perspective. Which software and which camera/lens-combination do you use? --Tuxyso (talk) 06:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Théatre de la Mer à Sète.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Théatre de la Mer à Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. --Selbymay 09:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Théatre de la Mer à Sète 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Théatre de la Mer à Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Please re-review

Hi! You reviewed File:Brueckenansicht-Muega-2013.jpg. I've uploaded a new version. Please take another look and support if possible. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Douch, Rosis, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Douch, Rosis, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not absolutely sharp but nice mood. --JLPC 17:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Phare de Sète (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare de Sète (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Rosis, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosis, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 08:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Douch, Rosis, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Douch, Rosis, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Refuge forestier de Font-Salesse, Mons, Hérault (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Refuge forestier de Font-Salesse, Mons, Hérault (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Minor purple CA in the branches, but ok --Poco a poco 15:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pinus halepensis, Rosis, Hérault (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinus halepensis, Rosis, Hérault (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:29, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Rosis, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosis, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Iifar 18:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exif data

Bonjour Christian,

merci pour l'ajout des exif dans tes photos. En fait, j'ignorais que l'on pouvait séparer les données exif des photos, mais ces infos sont toujours utiles pour évaluer les images soumises aux QI (ouverture, temps de pose, etc). Bonnes contributions!

--Selbymay (talk) 19:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Massif du Caroux, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massif du Caroux, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality for me now. --JLPC 18:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Observation deck and Orb Valley, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observation deck and Orb Valley, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. (why there is no exif data?) --Selbymay 08:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Exif data donwloaded. --Christian Ferrer 10:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Orb Valley, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orb Valley, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
imho ok. but... why there is no exif data? --Steinsplitter 09:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Exif data donwloaded. --Christian Ferrer 10:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Bridge over Canal du Midi, Vias.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge over Canal du Midi, Vias.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --JLPC 16:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (07).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 08:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (06).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support good quality --A.Savin 08:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (08).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 16:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 16:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Celtis australis, Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celtis australis, Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK, but sharpness could still be better. Try f/14 or f/16 for landscape with foreground, next time. DoF ist too small with f/11. --NorbertNagel 20:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for advice. --Christian Ferrer 21:57, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --Llorenzi 17:49, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Mont Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 19:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC) Thanks for rewiew, sharpened version uploaded. --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sète from Saint-Clair 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 09:46, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Marine Graveyard, Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marine Graveyard, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Important place. Could be better with a touch of local contrast and high-pass filter (easy to fix). --JLPC 16:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Question: contrast more or less? And what is a high-pass filter please? --Christian Ferrer 19:26, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Contrasted and sharpened. --Christian Ferrer 05:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
QI for me now. --JLPC 17:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mazet et friches, Pinet, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mazet et friches, Pinet, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Quality is OK, but photo looks a bit washed out. Probably you can work on it. --Tuxyso 16:09, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for rewiew, new version uploaded. --Christian Ferrer 18:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Malchen53 07:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 06:06, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Malchen53 07:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vitis vinifera and Papaver rhoeas, Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitis vinifera and Papaver rhoeas, Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, main object is in focus. --Tuxyso 21:41, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (05).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
IMHO is is CW tiltet. --Tuxyso 06:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Tilted. --Christian Ferrer 11:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
I think you tilted into the wrong direction :) --Tuxyso 12:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Tilted another. --Christian Ferrer 17:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Looks OK. --Tuxyso 21:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Jaur and Orb Valleys, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaur and Orb Valleys, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Need some sharpening in foreground, Good job --The Photographer 03:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Background sharpened, thanks. --Christian Ferrer 19:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Symbol support vote.svg Support Only for a bit --The Photographer 12:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, j'ai vu ta photo File:Jaur and Orb Valleys, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg en entrant sur Wikipedia, et le commentaire me gêne un peu : quand on regarde vers le Sud, on a l'Ouest à Droite et l'Est à Gauche, et donc le Sud-Est à 10h-11h (12h plein Sud, 9h plein Est), à Gauche du Sud. N'y a-t-il pas inversion, soit des 2 vallées, soit de leur orientation ? Je suis contributeur sur Wikisource, n'intervient qu'épisodiquement sur Commons pour uploader un fichier djvu récupéré sur Gallica. Cordialement --Didieram (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour ta réponse, je me doutais bien que c'était une petite erreur d'inattention ! J'ai fait il y a longtemps une ballade dans le Caroux : tes photos donnent envie d'y retourner ! La ballade vers ce point est longue ? Amicalement --Didieram (talk) 18:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Merci pour tes indications touristiques, et au fait, bravo pour tes photos !--Didieram (talk) 17:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Fort Richelieu, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Richelieu, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK to me. --Florstein 16:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Phare du Mont-Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare du Mont-Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Qualitiy is ok. --Arcalino 10:56, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Phare du Mont-Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare du Mont-Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Massive CAs. --Tuxyso 21:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Suppression CAs. --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Better. Perspective is not 100% optimal (top of the lighthouse is slightly distorted) but still OK because additional correcture would not help here. --Tuxyso 06:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sète from Saint-Clair.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice composition but a bit unsharp.--Hic et nunc 10:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Sharpened. --Christian Ferrer 12:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Now it's better.--Hic et nunc 10:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image quality

Hi, I just had a look at 6 of your images at QIC and found them all too blurry to promote. It’s a pity, since your images are well composed, just lack technical quality. Maybe you should afford a better lens or have yours serviced for better quality (=overall sharpness). The 18–55 is a cheap kit lens of course but should not be that bad. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 09:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --JLPC 17:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
View of Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --PJDespa 14:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Les Aresquiers , Frontignan, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Aresquiers , Frontignan, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 07:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Impasse des Rêves, Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Impasse des Rêves, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality --Arcalino 19:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Les Aires, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I would suggest to brighten the buildings. Do you know Viveza (ideal for that case) --Tuxyso 15:29, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Brightened. --Christian Ferrer 16:39, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Better and QI now. --Tuxyso 18:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maritime weather, Théatre de la Mer, Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maritime weather, Théatre de la Mer, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 18:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maritime weather, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maritime weather, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Maybe a bit underexposed, but QI for me. --Kadellar 15:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maritime weather, Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maritime weather, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 15:54, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aperture

Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg

Hi, I promoted your pic (it’s a fine composition) but would like to point out there’s some loss of detail (see trees below center, or roof tiles) the reason of which I suspect is the relatively small aperture of f/16 you chose. Though a small aperture offers great depth of field, it still lowers the overall resolution of the lens. To achieve maximum level of detail, close the aperture not more than 1-2 stops (this applies for most lenses), if no huge DoF is needed and lighting/shutter speed allows. I often carry a ND (grey) filter with me on sunny days so I can use the "fast" apertures even in bright sunlight. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 22:31, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --JLPC 14:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --3uclides64 18:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support sharpness not the best, but OK for QI --A.Savin 12:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Les Abbes, Les Aires, Hérault..jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Abbes, Les Aires, Hérault..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Could be a bit brighter, but QI. --JLPC 16:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lamalou-Les-Bains from Les Aires, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamalou-Les-Bains from Les Aires, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok--Lmbuga 14:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 00.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 11:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I'm convinced now --Smial 22:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I'm convinced now --Smial 22:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good now --Smial 13:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
View from Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 23:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support good --A.Savin 16:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo 13:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GA candidate.svg Weak support Bit noisy in the shadows but still QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 22:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fort Richelieu, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Richelieu, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 07:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sète from Saint-Clair 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Looks ok for me after the corrections --Arcalino 20:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --JLPC 14:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --3uclides64 18:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support sharpness not the best, but OK for QI --A.Savin 12:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Les Abbes, Les Aires, Hérault..jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Abbes, Les Aires, Hérault..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Could be a bit brighter, but QI. --JLPC 16:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lamalou-Les-Bains from Les Aires, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamalou-Les-Bains from Les Aires, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok--Lmbuga 14:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 00.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 11:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I'm convinced now --Smial 22:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I'm convinced now --Smial 22:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good now --Smial 13:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
View from Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 23:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support good --A.Savin 16:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo 13:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GA candidate.svg Weak support Bit noisy in the shadows but still QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 22:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fort Richelieu, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Richelieu, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 07:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sète from Saint-Clair 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Looks ok for me after the corrections --Arcalino 20:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Étang de Thau, Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang de Thau, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --JLPC 17:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cordon littoral, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cordon littoral, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. A mon avis il y a un peu trop de verdure en bas. --Cayambe 19:07, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Cordon littoral, Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cordon littoral, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please sharpen. Mattbuck 21:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for rewiew but sorry, I have lost RAW file, nothing I can do. --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
You could press the sharpen button on photoshop... Mattbuck 17:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Sharpened JPEG, with lightroom. --Christian Ferrer 17:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 19:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

View from Sète, Hérault.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
View from Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Mattbuck 18:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Lieu-dit Saint-Joseph, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lieu-dit Saint-Joseph, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pont Saint-Joseph, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Saint-Joseph, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and very nice imo. --JLPC 07:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]
Hérault River, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hérault River, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A bit too dark imo. You can easily brighten it, I think. --JLPC 16:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Brightened --Christian Ferrer 17:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
QI now. --JLPC 07:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sète from Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète from Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment shady areas are underexposed and a bit noisy + see annotations --Carschten 18:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done New version, but some CA is reclcitrant --Christian Ferrer 05:34, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have uploaded a new version of the same shot with aperture F/10, I think it's much better. --Christian Ferrer 10:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version without CA. QI now for me --Carschten 11:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Canal du Midi, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Much better --Poco a poco 18:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Florstein 15:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Florstein 15:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (09).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 15:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
You forgot to crop the gray frame and to remove the CAs. --Tuxyso 10:40, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Crop the gray frame and a little of the left because of recalcitrant CA --Christian Ferrer 17:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Much better now. --Tuxyso 08:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok for me. -- Arcalino 08:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moonik 12:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 13:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re:Liebfrauenkirche, Tier (by Pudelek).jpg

It's OK, thanks ;) --Pudelek (talk) 15:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus halepensis, Castelnau-de-Guers 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus halepensis, Castelnau-de-Guers 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus halepensis, Castelnau-de-Guers 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus halepensis, Castelnau-de-Guers 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. You're improving. --NorbertNagel 17:54, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Hey, thanks, count on me that I continue --Christian Ferrer 18:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steinsplitter 19:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus halepensis, Castelnau-de-Guers 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus halepensis, Castelnau-de-Guers 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Quai d'Alger, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai d'Alger, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Too blueish, check WB. There's CA too. --Kadellar 22:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Less blue and CA --Christian Ferrer 07:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, QI now. --Kadellar 18:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Quai d'Alger, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai d'Alger, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Too blueish, check WB. --Kadellar 22:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC))
✓ Done Less blue --Christian Ferrer 07:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, QI now. --Kadellar 18:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 07:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moonik 05:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Canal du Midi, Agde, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Agde, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Bit unsharp but ok. --Mattbuck 17:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Pont de la Victoire, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de la Victoire, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Je trouve le 'tone mapping' excellent ici, plus lumineux et à mon avis bien meilleur que dans les images antérieures que tu as présentées ici. --Cayambe 16:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks, it's not the same camera --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
View from Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Frontignan, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Frontignan, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. New camera? --NorbertNagel 18:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Yes, I buy a Ferrari --Christian Ferrer 05:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
And a quite good and useful lens too, as it seems. Congrats! --Kreuzschnabel 11:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Ouvrages du Libron, Vias, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ouvrages du Libron, Vias, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:44, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ouvrages du Libron, Vias, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ouvrages du Libron, Vias, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ouvrages du Libron, Vias, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ouvrages du Libron, Vias, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Collines de la Moures, Montbazin, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collines de la Moures, Montbazin, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 19:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Église Saint-Pierre de Montbazin, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre de Montbazin, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 11:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Église Saint-Pierre de Montbazin, Hérault 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre de Montbazin, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Montbazin, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montbazin, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, but close to be oversharpened. See weak halos at the edges for example at the wires.. --NorbertNagel 16:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for information --Christian Ferrer 18:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Frontignan, Hérault 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --null 15:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request Please login, anonymous votes will not be counted. Thank you. Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me --Haneburger 06:00, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

La Plage de Sète, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Plage de Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 16:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Collines de la Moures, Montbazin, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collines de la Moures, Montbazin, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Lmbuga 12:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Montbazin, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montbazin, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --Kor!An 21:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Port de Sète, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port de Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Blur on the left, CA on the right. I suggest a crop on the left. Mattbuck 19:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done --Christian Ferrer 04:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Better. Mattbuck 21:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Port de Sète, Hérault 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port de Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please fix dust spots. Mattbuck 19:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done --Christian Ferrer 04:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 21:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

La Corniche, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Corniche, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
La Plage de Sète, Hérault 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Plage de Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]