User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive1
February - June 2013
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2014 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2015 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2016 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2017 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2018 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2019 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2020 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2021 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2022 • jan-feb • mar-apr • Current |
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:30, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Please log in to vote
Hello,
Please log in to vote in Quality Images. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, are you this user? In that case, why don't you login? Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Syntax error
Bonjour. Juste un mot au sujet de ta photo d'hier : Nino Verde a commenté ta nouvelle mouture, en même temps que la mienne... mais il a fait deux erreurs de syntaxe, si bien que ses commentaires n'apparaissent pas dans les rectangles bleus où ils devraient être lisibles. J'ai corrigé l'erreur sous mon image, mais je n'ai pas voulu modifier le texte d'un contributeur particulièrement pointilleux (!) sous l'image d'un autre. En revanche, je l'ai prévenu de ses erreurs de syntaxe et je fais de même en ce qui te concerne, pour que tu puisses éventuellement intervenir. -- Autre point : ça fait un certain temps que je désire entrer en contact avec toi car j'ai constaté que nous avions le même problème : un Pentax K5 dont les résultats sont particulièrement décevants. Je n'ai pas le temps de développer maintenant mais nous pourrons peut-être échanger si ça t'intéresse (je suis retraité et j'ai du loisir !). -- J'ai utilisé le tutoiement comme il est d'usage entre utilisateurs français : si c'est gênant, on changera. -- Bonne soirée. Cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phare de Sète (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Grondin 17:25, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brise-lames à Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Much better --Poco a poco 19:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
|
RAW file
Hi Christian! I reviewed your photo on QIC. If you like you can send the RAW to MyWikipediaNickname@gmail.com (with the real nickname Tuxyso) and I can help you with hightlights and perspective. Which software and which camera/lens-combination do you use? --Tuxyso (talk) 06:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Théatre de la Mer à Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Nice. --Selbymay 09:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Théatre de la Mer à Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|
Please re-review
Hi! You reviewed File:Brueckenansicht-Muega-2013.jpg. I've uploaded a new version. Please take another look and support if possible. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Douch, Rosis, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Not absolutely sharp but nice mood. --JLPC 17:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phare de Sète (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rosis, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --A.Savin 08:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Douch, Rosis, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Refuge forestier de Font-Salesse, Mons, Hérault (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Minor purple CA in the branches, but ok --Poco a poco 15:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pinus halepensis, Rosis, Hérault (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 17:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:29, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rosis, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support --Iifar 18:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Exif data
Bonjour Christian,
merci pour l'ajout des exif dans tes photos. En fait, j'ignorais que l'on pouvait séparer les données exif des photos, mais ces infos sont toujours utiles pour évaluer les images soumises aux QI (ouverture, temps de pose, etc). Bonnes contributions!
--Selbymay (talk) 19:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Massif du Caroux, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality for me now. --JLPC 18:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Observation deck and Orb Valley, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Nice. (why there is no exif data?) --Selbymay 08:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Exif data donwloaded. --Christian Ferrer 10:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Orb Valley, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. imho ok. but... why there is no exif data? --Steinsplitter 09:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Exif data donwloaded. --Christian Ferrer 10:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge over Canal du Midi, Vias.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. QI for me. --JLPC 16:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --A.Savin 08:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support good quality --A.Savin 08:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --A.Savin 16:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --A.Savin 16:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Celtis australis, Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. OK, but sharpness could still be better. Try f/14 or f/16 for landscape with foreground, next time. DoF ist too small with f/11. --NorbertNagel 20:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for advice. --Christian Ferrer 21:57, 11 May 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --Llorenzi 17:49, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mont Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 19:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC) Thanks for rewiew, sharpened version uploaded. --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --A.Savin 09:46, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marine Graveyard, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Important place. Could be better with a touch of local contrast and high-pass filter (easy to fix). --JLPC 16:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC) Question: contrast more or less? And what is a high-pass filter please? --Christian Ferrer 19:26, 13 May 2013 (UTC) Done Contrasted and sharpened. --Christian Ferrer 05:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC) QI for me now. --JLPC 17:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mazet et friches, Pinet, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Quality is OK, but photo looks a bit washed out. Probably you can work on it. --Tuxyso 16:09, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for rewiew, new version uploaded. --Christian Ferrer 18:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Malchen53 07:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Cayambe 06:06, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyard, Pinet, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Malchen53 07:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vitis vinifera and Papaver rhoeas, Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality, main object is in focus. --Tuxyso 21:41, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. IMHO is is CW tiltet. --Tuxyso 06:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Tilted. --Christian Ferrer 11:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC) I think you tilted into the wrong direction :) --Tuxyso 12:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC) Done Tilted another. --Christian Ferrer 17:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC) Looks OK. --Tuxyso 21:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jaur and Orb Valleys, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Need some sharpening in foreground, Good job --The Photographer 03:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Background sharpened, thanks. --Christian Ferrer 19:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC) Support Only for a bit --The Photographer 12:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
- Bonjour, j'ai vu ta photo File:Jaur and Orb Valleys, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg en entrant sur Wikipedia, et le commentaire me gêne un peu : quand on regarde vers le Sud, on a l'Ouest à Droite et l'Est à Gauche, et donc le Sud-Est à 10h-11h (12h plein Sud, 9h plein Est), à Gauche du Sud. N'y a-t-il pas inversion, soit des 2 vallées, soit de leur orientation ? Je suis contributeur sur Wikisource, n'intervient qu'épisodiquement sur Commons pour uploader un fichier djvu récupéré sur Gallica. Cordialement --Didieram (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Merci pour ta réponse, je me doutais bien que c'était une petite erreur d'inattention ! J'ai fait il y a longtemps une ballade dans le Caroux : tes photos donnent envie d'y retourner ! La ballade vers ce point est longue ? Amicalement --Didieram (talk) 18:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Merci pour tes indications touristiques, et au fait, bravo pour tes photos !--Didieram (talk) 17:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Bonjour, j'ai vu ta photo File:Jaur and Orb Valleys, Saint-Martin-de-l'Arçon, Hérault.jpg en entrant sur Wikipedia, et le commentaire me gêne un peu : quand on regarde vers le Sud, on a l'Ouest à Droite et l'Est à Gauche, et donc le Sud-Est à 10h-11h (12h plein Sud, 9h plein Est), à Gauche du Sud. N'y a-t-il pas inversion, soit des 2 vallées, soit de leur orientation ? Je suis contributeur sur Wikisource, n'intervient qu'épisodiquement sur Commons pour uploader un fichier djvu récupéré sur Gallica. Cordialement --Didieram (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fort Richelieu, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. OK to me. --Florstein 16:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phare du Mont-Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Qualitiy is ok. --Arcalino 10:56, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phare du Mont-Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Massive CAs. --Tuxyso 21:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Suppression CAs. --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC) Better. Perspective is not 100% optimal (top of the lighthouse is slightly distorted) but still OK because additional correcture would not help here. --Tuxyso 06:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very nice composition but a bit unsharp.--Hic et nunc 10:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC) Done Sharpened. --Christian Ferrer 12:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Now it's better.--Hic et nunc 10:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC) |
Image quality
Hi, I just had a look at 6 of your images at QIC and found them all too blurry to promote. It’s a pity, since your images are well composed, just lack technical quality. Maybe you should afford a better lens or have yours serviced for better quality (=overall sharpness). The 18–55 is a cheap kit lens of course but should not be that bad. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 09:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. QI for me. --JLPC 17:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View of Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --PJDespa 14:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Aresquiers , Frontignan, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 07:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Impasse des Rêves, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good Quality --Arcalino 19:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. I would suggest to brighten the buildings. Do you know Viveza (ideal for that case) --Tuxyso 15:29, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Brightened. --Christian Ferrer 16:39, 20 May 2013 (UTC) Better and QI now. --Tuxyso 18:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maritime weather, Théatre de la Mer, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 18:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maritime weather, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Maybe a bit underexposed, but QI for me. --Kadellar 15:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maritime weather, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --A.Savin 15:54, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Aperture
Hi, I promoted your pic (it’s a fine composition) but would like to point out there’s some loss of detail (see trees below center, or roof tiles) the reason of which I suspect is the relatively small aperture of f/16 you chose. Though a small aperture offers great depth of field, it still lowers the overall resolution of the lens. To achieve maximum level of detail, close the aperture not more than 1-2 stops (this applies for most lenses), if no huge DoF is needed and lighting/shutter speed allows. I often carry a ND (grey) filter with me on sunny days so I can use the "fast" apertures even in bright sunlight. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 22:31, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. QI for me. --JLPC 14:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --3uclides64 18:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support sharpness not the best, but OK for QI --A.Savin 12:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Abbes, Les Aires, Hérault..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Could be a bit brighter, but QI. --JLPC 16:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lamalou-Les-Bains from Les Aires, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Ok--Lmbuga 14:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --A.Savin 11:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. I'm convinced now --Smial 22:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. I'm convinced now --Smial 22:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good now --Smial 13:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View from Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Coyau 23:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support good --A.Savin 16:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support --Rjcastillo 13:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Weak support Bit noisy in the shadows but still QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 22:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fort Richelieu, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Coyau 07:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Looks ok for me after the corrections --Arcalino 20:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. QI for me. --JLPC 14:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --3uclides64 18:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support sharpness not the best, but OK for QI --A.Savin 12:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Abbes, Les Aires, Hérault..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Could be a bit brighter, but QI. --JLPC 16:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lamalou-Les-Bains from Les Aires, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Ok--Lmbuga 14:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --A.Savin 11:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. I'm convinced now --Smial 22:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. I'm convinced now --Smial 22:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good now --Smial 13:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View from Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Coyau 23:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support good --A.Savin 16:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Aires, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support --Rjcastillo 13:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stairs, Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Weak support Bit noisy in the shadows but still QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 22:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fort Richelieu, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Coyau 07:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Looks ok for me after the corrections --Arcalino 20:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Étang de Thau, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. QI for me. --JLPC 17:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cordon littoral, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. A mon avis il y a un peu trop de verdure en bas. --Cayambe 19:07, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cordon littoral, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Please sharpen. Mattbuck 21:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for rewiew but sorry, I have lost RAW file, nothing I can do. --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC) You could press the sharpen button on photoshop... Mattbuck 17:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC) Done Sharpened JPEG, with lightroom. --Christian Ferrer 17:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 19:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View from Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 17:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel, Les Aires, Hérault 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View from Les Aires, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. OK. --Mattbuck 18:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lieu-dit Saint-Joseph, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont Saint-Joseph, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality and very nice imo. --JLPC 07:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC))
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hérault River, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comment A bit too dark imo. You can easily brighten it, I think. --JLPC 16:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC) Done Brightened --Christian Ferrer 17:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC) QI now. --JLPC 07:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sète from Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comment shady areas are underexposed and a bit noisy + see annotations --Carschten 18:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Done New version, but some CA is reclcitrant --Christian Ferrer 05:34, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Comment I have uploaded a new version of the same shot with aperture F/10, I think it's much better. --Christian Ferrer 10:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC) I uploaded a new version without CA. QI now for me --Carschten 11:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Much better --Poco a poco 18:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Florstein 15:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Florstein 15:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 17:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias, Hérault (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK --A.Savin 15:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruines de Mourcairol. Les Aires, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. You forgot to crop the gray frame and to remove the CAs. --Tuxyso 10:40, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Crop the gray frame and a little of the left because of recalcitrant CA --Christian Ferrer 17:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC) Much better now. --Tuxyso 08:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC) Support Ok for me. -- Arcalino 08:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moonik 12:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality.--ArildV 13:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
|
re:Liebfrauenkirche, Tier (by Pudelek).jpg
It's OK, thanks ;) --Pudelek (talk) 15:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus halepensis, Castelnau-de-Guers 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus halepensis, Castelnau-de-Guers 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. You're improving. --NorbertNagel 17:54, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Hey, thanks, count on me that I continue --Christian Ferrer 18:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Steinsplitter 19:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus halepensis, Castelnau-de-Guers 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frontignan-Plage, Frontignan, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quai d'Alger, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Too blueish, check WB. There's CA too. --Kadellar 22:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Done Less blue and CA --Christian Ferrer 07:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks, QI now. --Kadellar 18:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quai d'Alger, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Too blueish, check WB. --Kadellar 22:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC))
Done Less blue --Christian Ferrer 07:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks, QI now. --Kadellar 18:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Cayambe 07:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castelnau-de-Guers, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moonik 05:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Agde, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Bit unsharp but ok. --Mattbuck 17:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont de la Victoire, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. Je trouve le 'tone mapping' excellent ici, plus lumineux et à mon avis bien meilleur que dans les images antérieures que tu as présentées ici. --Cayambe 16:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks, it's not the same camera --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View from Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frontignan, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frontignan, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. New camera? --NorbertNagel 18:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Yes, I buy a Ferrari --Christian Ferrer 05:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
And a quite good and useful lens too, as it seems. Congrats! --Kreuzschnabel 11:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ouvrages du Libron, Vias, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:44, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ouvrages du Libron, Vias, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ouvrages du Libron, Vias, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Collines de la Moures, Montbazin, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 19:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre de Montbazin, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Cayambe 11:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre de Montbazin, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Montbazin, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality, but close to be oversharpened. See weak halos at the edges for example at the wires.. --NorbertNagel 16:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for information --Christian Ferrer 18:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frontignan, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Plage de Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 16:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Collines de la Moures, Montbazin, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality--Lmbuga 12:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Montbazin, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. QI for me. --Kor!An 21:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Port de Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Blur on the left, CA on the right. I suggest a crop on the left. Mattbuck 19:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Done --Christian Ferrer 04:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Port de Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Please fix dust spots. Mattbuck 19:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Done --Christian Ferrer 04:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 21:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Corniche, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Plage de Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
|