User talk:UnpetitproleX

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunrise over Sukhna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks tilted and the noise could be reduced a bit --Poco a poco 17:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco:  Done, how about now?--UnpetitproleX 18:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Nice mood and good quality for a phone pic. --Stepro 01:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kee monastery Spiti Valley (edited).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kee monastery Spiti Valley (edited).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Close-up view of front façade of Shankaracharya Temple, Srinagar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

The scope is Shankaracharya Temple, Srinagar, the related category containing the image is Category:Shankaracharya Temple. UnpetitproleX (talk) 08:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Linked, thanks --UnpetitproleX (talk)

---

Scope changed from Shankaracharya Temple, Srinagar to Front view of Shankaracharya Temple, Srinagar --UnpetitproleX (talk) 10:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Question Should "restored" be part of the scope? There are several more complete pictures of the facade, though I don't know if we're looking at the front or back in them, and the building seems in rougher condition. This is one example. Also, since neither this photo nor the cropped version of this photo show the entire front, it's arguable which version is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: It's less restored and more just the addition of railing, metal doors, protective scaffolding on top etc; this is the front facade, but yes, there seem to be more fuller pictures. Changing scope to "Close-up". Last change of scope, please judge if this scope fits. If not, then this picture probably shouldn't be a VI.--UnpetitproleX (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Front view of Shankaracharya Temple, Srinagar to Close-up view of front façade of Shankaracharya Temple, Srinagar --UnpetitproleX (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment I think File:The Ancient Shankaracharya Temple (Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir) (cropped).jpg is better in this scope. Would you like to nominate it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination moved. --UnpetitproleX (talk) 08:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Khurik Village, Lahaul and Spiti district.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

The scope is Khurik Village, Lahaul and Spiti District, the related category that contains the image is Category:Villages in Lahaul and Spiti District, Himachal Pradesh. UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Linked, thanks. --UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longwood (Shimla).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Visible artifacts, fixable? --F. Riedelio 06:43, 17 April 2022 (UTC) @F. Riedelio: Thanks for the review. Can you be a bit more specific, please? --UnpetitproleX 17:51, 17 April 2022 (UTC) @UnpetitproleX:  Answered At 100% resolution, there are noticeable artifacts (jpg compression?) and blurring in the foreground.--F. Riedelio 17:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC) Thanks, attempted to fix. --UnpetitproleX 02:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Better quality now. --F. Riedelio 09:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of the Palace of Assembly in Chandigarh with its outer water pool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Useful and often used -- Spurzem (talk) 14:43, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace of Assembly, Chandigarh illuminated.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christ Church, Shimla in snow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, beautiful image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Full view of the Nako Lake.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Open Hand Monument with Himalayan foothills in the background..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Kinner Kailash Mountain Range (edited).jpg

Hello UnpetitproleX,

regarding your nomination: I do not know what went wrong, but it should be possible to remove the labels without creating posterization. Please try if you can fix this (probably starting with the original photo again). If it does not work, ping me and I can try my luck = try to help, too ;–).

Best, --Aristeas (talk) 08:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

@Aristeas: Thank you very much, I have tried my best to fix that by re-editing the original performing all intervening edits at once to that. Please let me know if this edit is satisfactory, I probably cannot do better than this with my very limited experience. Your inputs are appreciated! UnpetitproleX (talk) 12:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello UnpetitproleX, thank you very much – the sky is much better! Now the image should be ready for a fair discussion.

Two general photo editing tips: (1) If you want to make several changes to a photo, first just open it and save it in a loseless format, e.g. as a TIFF image (*.tif), PSD (*.psd) image or, if you use Gimp, XCF (*xcf) image. Then you can make as many edits as you want and save it in between many times without quality losses. Only when you are completely done save the image again as a JPEG (*.jpg) image for uploading to Commons. Keep the original TIFF/PSD/XCF image to have it ready if users request more changes.

(2) Sometimes, when doing several complex gradation changes (making parts of the image brighter etc.), it can be helpful to convert the (TIFF/PSD/XCF) image first to a 16-bit image. Then do your changes. Only when you want export your result again as a JPEG image, convert it back to an 8-bit image and then save it as an JPEG image; keep the TIFF/PSD/XCF image in 16 bit. Using 16 bit can help to prevent posterization when doing several complex gradation changes one after another.

Best, --Aristeas (talk) 14:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, will keep this in mind! I now know whom to go to for guidance. :) UnpetitproleX (talk) 14:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama of Martand Sun Temple from southwestern corner.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment For this complex subject there can be several angles of view, it is necessary to put in the scope the direction of the shot.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus:  Done --UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Panorama of Martand Sun Temple to Panorama of Martand Sun Temple from southwestern corner --UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Assembly Chandigarh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Padmavati Chandigarh Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 05:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nigeen Lake pano.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nigeen Lake pano.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama of Jamia Masjid, Srinagar, eastern façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Useful, but there are various mosques called Jama Masjid and similar names, so I would suggest you put ", Srinagar" at the end of your scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Done --UnpetitproleX (talk) 00:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Support (Slight edit to scope; hope that's OK.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

  Yes it is, thanks! The ‘s was bothering me too. UnpetitproleX (talk) 12:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main gallery at Le Corbusier Centre, Chandigarh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gurudwara Arjun Ram, Lahore.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krimchi Temples, Udhampur (western view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)